Are SOAP notes the same length across specialties?

Generally no. Pediatrics well-child visits tend to be longer (developmental, anticipatory guidance). Psychiatry visits tend to include more S section (subjective). Dermatology and orthopedics can be very concise.

What's the difference between SOAP and BIRP for behavioral health?

SOAP: medical/clinical framework. BIRP (Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan): therapy framework, focuses on the therapeutic intervention and patient response. Many psych providers use BIRP for therapy, SOAP for med-management visits.

Should I use templates for every visit type?

Yes — templates with patient-specific fill-ins drastically reduce charting time without compromising defensibility. Auditors look for cookie-cutter notes (red flag), not templated structure (standard practice).

How specific should the assessment be?

Specific enough to support the billing code. "Hypertension" alone is weaker than "Essential hypertension, suboptimally controlled (target <130/80, currently 138/86)." The latter justifies the encounter level and treatment changes.

Can AI scribing handle specialty-specific templates?

Yes — modern AI scribes adapt to specialty-specific structures based on the provider's configured template. Setup is typically 1-2 visits to fine-tune.

SOAP Note Examples by Specialty

Q: Can AI scribing handle specialty-specific templates?

Yes — modern AI scribes adapt to specialty-specific structures based on the provider's configured template. Setup is typically 1-2 visits to fine-tune.

Every specialty does SOAP notes slightly differently. Here are real examples across 8 specialties so you can model your own.

Try AI Doctor Notes free â

While every specialty uses the SOAP framework, the specifics of what goes into each section varies significantly. A psychiatry SOAP looks very different from a dermatology SOAP. Here are examples by specialty, with the unique elements each requires.

Family Medicine: Hypertension follow-up

S: 58 yo M est pt for 3-mo HTN f/u. Compliant with lisinopril 20mg. Home BP 130-145/80-90. Denies sx. No new meds.
O: BP 138/86, HR 72. BMI 31. CV/Lungs unremarkable. No edema. Recent BMP unremarkable.
A: Essential HTN, suboptimal control. Obesity.
P: Increase lisinopril to 40mg. DASH diet reinforcement. Repeat BMP 4 wks. RTC 6 wks.

Internal Medicine: Diabetes management

S: 62 yo F T2DM x 8 yrs presents for routine f/u. On metformin 1000mg BID, glipizide 5mg daily. Home FSBG 120-160 fasting, 180-220 post-meal. Compliant with diet/exercise. No hypoglycemic events. No new sx.
O: BP 132/82, HR 76, BMI 29. Cardiac/Pulmonary exam normal. Feet: monofilament intact, no ulcerations, pulses 2+. Recent A1C 7.4%, LDL 88, BUN/Cr stable, eGFR 71.
A: T2DM, uncontrolled (A1C above target 7.0%). HTN, controlled. Hyperlipidemia, controlled on statin.
P: 1) Add empagliflozin 10mg daily. 2) Continue metformin/glipizide unchanged. 3) Continue DASH diet, 150 min/wk exercise. 4) Annual diabetic foot exam scheduled. 5) Repeat A1C, lipid panel 3 mo. 6) Eye exam due â refer ophthalmology.

Dental (general): Endo emergency

S: Pt c/o throbbing pain LL quadrant x 3d, severity 7/10, lingers with cold >30 sec, awakens pt at night. Ibuprofen partial relief.
O: BP 138/85. EOE/IOE WNL. #19: percussion + (severe), no swelling, no fistula, no perio probing >3mm. Cold test: lingering >30 sec. EPT: hyperresponse. PA #19: deep occlusal restoration approximating pulp, no PARL, normal PDL.
A: Irreversible pulpitis #19.
P: Tx options reviewed; pt elects RCT. LA 4% articaine 1:200k epi 1.7mL IAN. Access #19, pulp extirpation, working length ML 21.5mm B 22mm DL 21mm. Cleaned/shaped to F2 ProTaper, irrigated 6% NaOCl, Ca(OH)2 medication, Cavit. RX ibuprofen 600mg q6h x 5d. RTC 1 wk for obturation.

Dermatology: Acne follow-up

S: 17 yo M est pt presents for acne f/u, currently on topical adapalene 0.1% qhs and oral doxycycline 100mg BID x 3 mo. Reports moderate improvement, fewer new lesions. Adherent. No GI side effects, no photosensitivity issues. No depression sx.
O: Face: comedonal acne reduced, residual inflammatory papules on cheeks bilaterally (count: ~12 R, ~10 L). No cysts, no scarring. Back: minimal acne. PEx otherwise normal.
A: Acne vulgaris, moderate, improved on combination therapy.
P: Continue current regimen. Consider stepping down doxycycline to 100mg daily after another 2 mo if continued improvement. Sun protection emphasized. RTC 8 wks. If incomplete response, consider isotretinoin discussion.

Orthopedics: Knee pain

S: 52 yo F presents with R knee pain x 6 wks, gradual onset, no specific injury. Pain 5/10 with stairs, worse end of day. No locking, no instability. Tylenol partial relief.
O: BMI 32. R knee: mild effusion, no warmth/erythema. ROM 0-130 (vs L 0-140). Crepitus on flexion. Lachman/anterior drawer/McMurray negative. Tenderness medial joint line. Radiographs (today): mild medial joint space narrowing R knee, no fracture.
A: Right knee osteoarthritis, mild-moderate.
P: 1) NSAIDs (meloxicam 15mg daily PRN, max 14 days) â no GI/renal contraindications. 2) PT referral, 6 sessions, focus quad strengthening + low-impact conditioning. 3) Weight loss counseling discussed. 4) Avoid high-impact activity. 5) RTC 8 wks. If no improvement, consider intra-articular cortisone injection.

Psychiatry: Depression follow-up (uses BIRP/DAP often)

S: 34 yo F est pt presents for depression f/u, on sertraline 100mg daily x 6 wks. Reports mood "better â maybe 5/10 vs 2/10 before." Energy improved. Sleep 7-8 hrs (was 4-5). Appetite normal. No SI/HI. Side effects: mild nausea first 2 wks, resolved. No sexual side effects.
O: Affect brighter than baseline. Eye contact appropriate. Speech normal rate/rhythm. Linear thought process. No psychotic features. PHQ-9 today: 9 (was 18 at intake). C-SSRS negative.
A: MDD, moderate, improving on sertraline. Treatment response within expected timeline.
P: 1) Continue sertraline 100mg. 2) Weekly therapy continued. 3) Reinforce sleep hygiene, exercise. 4) RTC 4 wks. 5) Patient educated on continuing medication for at least 6-12 mo even after full response.

Pediatrics: Well-child visit (4-year)

S: 4 yo M presents for well-child visit. No concerns from parents. Eating well, sleeping 11 hrs/night. Speech/language age-appropriate. Toilet trained day/night. No behavioral concerns. Up to date on immunizations through 18 mo. Diet: balanced, no allergies. No screen time concerns. Family hx negative for chronic illness, mental health.
O: Wt 18.5 kg (75%ile), Ht 105 cm (75%ile), BMI 16.8 (50%ile). VS WNL. PEx: alert, age-appropriate. HEENT normal. CV/Lungs normal. Abd soft. Genitals normal. Skin clear. Develops appropriate per Denver II milestones.
A: Healthy 4 yo, normal growth and development. Vaccines due today.
P: 1) Today: DTaP #5, IPV #4, MMR #2, Varicella #2. 2) Anticipatory guidance: car seat (booster), helmet for biking, water safety, screen time <1 hr/day, dental visits q6mo. 3) Next well-child 5 yo. 4) Vision/hearing screen today: passed.

Common patterns across specialties

Despite specialty differences, well-written SOAP notes share:

Specific quantitative observations where relevant (BP, BMI, dose, A1C, joint ROM degrees)
Clinical reasoning visible in the A section, not just a diagnosis
Plan tied directly to the assessment
Time-stamped follow-up
Explicit return-precautions where relevant

Stop typing notes. Start seeing patients.

AI listens to the visit, generates a structured SOAP note, posts to your EHR. Save 60+ minutes per provider per day.

Try free for 14 days â

Frequently Asked Questions

Are SOAP notes the same length across specialties?: Generally no. Pediatrics well-child visits tend to be longer (developmental, anticipatory guidance). Psychiatry visits tend to include more S section (subjective). Dermatology and orthopedics can be very concise.
What's the difference between SOAP and BIRP for behavioral health?: SOAP: medical/clinical framework. BIRP (Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan): therapy framework, focuses on the therapeutic intervention and patient response. Many psych providers use BIRP for therapy, SOAP for med-management visits.
Should I use templates for every visit type?: Yes â templates with patient-specific fill-ins drastically reduce charting time without compromising defensibility. Auditors look for cookie-cutter notes (red flag), not templated structure (standard practice).
How specific should the assessment be?: Specific enough to support the billing code. "Hypertension" alone is weaker than "Essential hypertension, suboptimally controlled (target <130/80, currently 138/86)." The latter justifies the encounter level and treatment changes.
Can AI scribing handle specialty-specific templates?: Yes â modern AI scribes adapt to specialty-specific structures based on the provider's configured template. Setup is typically 1-2 visits to fine-tune.

Related guides

Educational content. AI Doctor Notes is HIPAA-compliant and BAA-eligible; for compliance specifics consult our security page or your privacy officer.